FinanceMap’s 2024 assessment of the Big Five Canadian banks shows that the firms are undermining their own net zero commitments through their financing activities, lack of robust sector financing policies, and inconsistent policy engagement. This is despite all five banks (Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) being signatories to the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA).

• Notably, the banks’ fossil fuel financing activities and limited fossil fuel exclusion policies are highly misaligned with IEA and IPCC net zero pathways. Between 2020 and 2022, the Big Five steadily increased their fossil fuel financing exposure from an average of 15.5% in 2020 to 18.4% in 2022, facilitating a total of $275 billion (USD) in financing to fossil fuel value chain companies over this period. This compares with an average of 6.1% for leading US banks and 8.7% for European banks across the same period.
• None of the banks have committed to a phaseout of financing thermal coal. Where they have put in place fossil fuel exclusion policies, these only apply to certain unconventional oil and gas activities. Meanwhile, the Canadian oil and gas sector has seen high profits in recent years, renewing interest in the expansion of production and infrastructure. As a result, the Big Five’s facilitated financing to Canadian oil and gas companies increased from $36 billion in 2020 to $73 billion in 2022. Domestic oil and gas financing represented 68% of the banks’ total oil and gas financing deal flows over the three-year period.
• While the Big Five banks are all members of the Net Zero Banking Alliance, none of them have publicly advocated for ambitious climate-related policy in Canada. In fact, the banks belong to industry associations that are working to block or dilute climate-related policies in Canada and globally. This is despite the NZBA commitment statement outlining that signatories will “engage on public policies to help support a net-zero transition of economic sectors in line with science.”
• The Canadian Bankers Association, a financial industry group representing all five banks, has emphasized that Canada does not require climate-related financial regulation and that the pace of the energy transition should be determined by real-economy policies. All five banks are also members of cross-sector industry associations, including the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Business Council of Canada, that are advocating for the expansion of Canadian fossil gas production and blocking or diluting real-economy climate policy in Canada and globally.
• This research analyzed $1.6 trillion in corporate lending and bond and equity underwriting deals at the Big Five banks in 2020, 2021, and 2022. According to BloombergNEF, the ratio of investment in fossil-fuel to low-carbon energy supply must reach 1 to 4 by 2030 to achieve a 1.5°C scenario. The Canadian Big Five’s financing deal flows inverted this ratio in 2020-2022 to 3.9 to 1 in favor of fossil fuel financing. 16.9% of all facilitated financing assessed went to oil, gas, and coal companies, compared to just 4.3% to companies identified as green. The Big Five’s ratio of financing fossil fuel companies over green is significantly higher than that of leading US (2.8 to 1) and European (2.0 to 1) banks. BMO had the highest fossil-fuel-to-green ratio at 6.8 to 1, while Scotiabank had the lowest at 3.0 to 1.
• The Big Five banks do not appear to be aligning their short- and medium-term emissions reduction targets with their long-term net zero commitments. All five banks have set 2030 interim targets for the oil, gas, and power sectors among other sector targets. However, these are almost all relative, intensity-based targets, allowing for absolute financed emissions to rise. Only BMO has set a target to reduce its absolute Scope 3 oil and gas emissions. Meanwhile, RBC, Scotiabank, and BMO have only included lending activities in their targets,omitting key financing streams such as capital markets activities from their targets. The Big Five have facilitated $74 billion (USD) in bond and equity underwriting to companies in the fossil fuel value chain between 2020 and 2022, representing 16.0% of their total assessed underwriting deal value.
• FinanceMap’s assessment of the banks’ climate governance, strategy, and policies against TCFD guidelines and IPCC/IEA technology positions shows that there are no leaders in the Canadian banking sector, with an average regional score of D+. Although the Big Five banks appear to have integrated climate considerations into their reporting on governance processes and risk management, they do not show evidence of robust climate strategies and are lagging in the metrics and targets used to assess and manage material climate risks and opportunities. Compared to other regions, the Canadian banks are on par with US banks (D+average) and trailing behind European banks (C+ average) in this regard.

All firms covered in this research were offered the opportunity to review the analysis and provide feedback prior to release. For details on our content and terms of use, please see our Terms and Conditions.

See the original press release on the InfluenceMap website here.