Blog
BankTrack news
BankTrack blog
Partner news
Partner blog
Bank
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)Canada
Active
This profile is actively maintained
Last update: 2024-10-07 16:08:10
Royal Bank Building in Toronto, Canada. Photo: Siqbal via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Active
This profile is actively maintained
Last update: 2024-10-07 16:08:10
Bank info
BankTrack campaigns
All
About
| Website | http://www.rbc.com |
| Headquarters |
200 Bay Street
ON M5J 2J5 Toronto
Canada
|
| CEO/chair |
David McKay CEO |
| Supervisor | |
| Ownership |
listed on NYSE, SIX Swiss Exchange & Toronto Stock Exchange
Royal Bank of Canada's shareholder structure can be accessed here. |
The Royal Bank of Canada (in French, Banque Royale du Canada, and commonly RBC in either language) was founded in 1864 in Halifax, Nova Scotia and is the largest financial institution in Canada by measured deposits, revenues, and market capitalisation. The bank serves sixteen million clients and has more than 81,000 employees worldwide. The bank offers retail banking, corporate banking and investment banking services.
Sustainability
Commitments
Policies
Voluntary standards
Royal Bank of Canada's most important sustainability commitments can be found at the website sections listed below.
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) has committed itself to the following voluntary standards:
Dodgy Deals
Royal Bank Of Canada (RBC) is linked to a number of companies and projects that BankTrack considers controversial (so called Dodgy Deals), e.g. as a current or past financier or through an expression of interest. The profiles below provide more details on the nature of Royal Bank Of Canada (RBC)'s link to these deals.
Projects / Companies
Finance type
Year
News
BankTrack
Partners
Blog
External
Resources
Documents
Videos
Links
Accountability
Grievances
Response
tracking
Royal Bank of Cananda's Business Activities & Human Rights communication channel allows individuals and communities adversly affected by the bank's finance to raise a complaint.
Stakeholders may also raise complaints via the OECD National Contact Points (see OECD Watch guidance).
Royal Bank of Canada is an Equator Principles signatory. While the Equator Principles have no official grievance mechanism, complaints relating to this bank's financing of Equator Principles projects can be filed through our own website www.equator-complaints.org.
This page evaluates Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)'s responses to instances of alleged human rights violations linked to its finance, raised by civil society organisations. It is not intended to be exhaustive, but covers selected impacts raised by BankTrack and other civil society partners since 2016. For the full scoring methodology, see here. For more information about BankTrack's evaluation of bank responses to human rights impacts, see the 2021 report "Actions speak louder: assessing bank responses to human rights violations".
Impacts reviewed
Responded?
Total score
Response
Action
Monitoring
East African Crude Oil Pipeline (March 2021)
1
0.5
0.5
0
Response
0.5
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank publicly responded confirming that it is “not involved in the project”. It did not comment on or respond to the substance of the issues raised. Action
0.5
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank took appropriate action by publicly stating that it would not provide finance to the project; however, the bank remains exposed to TotalEnergies, the project developer, and it has not (yet) set out specific actions that it requires (or will require) the company to take to address the impact raised. Monitoring
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information available on whether the bank monitored measures taken by its client to address the impacts associated with the project. Myanmar: Equity exposure to companies linked to the military regime (October 2021)
0
0
0
0
Response
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank responded citing client confidentiality and its relevant ESG policies, but failed to acknowledge a link to the allegations and did not respond to the substance of the issues raised. Action
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank does not engage with the allegations and do not mention appropriate measures of action. It only reiterates its engagment with ESG polciies but do not respond to any of the allegations. Monitoring
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information available about whether the bank monitored progress. More info
Santos' Barossa gas project, Australia (July 2023)
1.5
1
0.5
0
Response
1
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank responded confirming a link to the company (confirming it provided a loan to the company in question together with a syndicate of banks), and it acknowledged the human rights impacts raised. Action
0.5
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank stated that it has engaged with its client on the impacts raised. However, it did not set out how it has exercised its leverage or taken any further steps to address the impacts. Monitoring
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information available on whether the bank monitored progress. More info
Rio Tinto's Jadar mine, Serbia (December 2021)
0
0
0
0
Response
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank confirmed reciept but did not otherwise respond. Action
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information available on whether the bank engaged with its client or took appropriate action. Monitoring
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information to indicate the bank is monitoring the actions of its clients, or actions it might itself have taken in response to the impacts raised. More info
ArcelorMittal steel impacts (June 2024)
0
0
0
n/a
Response
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
The bank publically responded, but cites that they "do not comment on client-specific matters." Action
0
Out of 1
Rationale for score
No information available on whether the bank engaged with its client or took appropriate action. Monitoring
n/a
Rationale for score
The impact was not raised over a year ago and therefore is not scored on monitoring progress. More info
Average
80%
0.5
0.3
0.2
0
Banks and Climate
Banks and Climate
The 2024 Banking on Climate Chaos report showed that Royal Bank of Canada provided US$ 256.445 Billion in financing to the fossil fuel industry between 2016 and 2023. In 2023 only, Royal Bank of Canada provided US$ 14.924 Billion for oil, gas and coal companies expanding fossil fuels. Find further details on Royal Bank of Canada fossil fuel portfolio and how it compares to other large banks globally on Fossil Banks No Thanks and in the Banking on Climate Chaos report.
Partner organisation Reclaim Finance tracks the coal, oil and gas policies of financial institutions, including banks, in their Coal Policy Tool (CPT) and the Oil and Gas Policy Tracker (OGPT). BankTrack works closely with Reclaim Finance and endorses their policy assesments. Find further details on their assessment of Royal Bank of Canada's fossil fuel policy below.
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Human Rights
BankTrack assessed Royal Bank of Canada in its 2022 Global Human Rights Benchmark, where it achieved 4 points out of 14 and was ranked as a follower. In addition, Royal Bank of Canada scored 0.6 out of 3 on how it responds to alleged human rights violations linked to its finance, which were raised by civil society organisations. More information is detailed in the "Accountability" section of this profile.
Global Human Rights Benchmark 2022
BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)
CAN
4
Follower
4
0
Explanation
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 3 points
3.5 - 6.5 points
7 - 10 points
10.5 - 14 points
For more details see this page.
Banks and Nature
Banks and Nature
Royal Bank of Canada’s policies for forest-risk sectors (beef, soy, palm oil, pulp and paper, rubber and timber) have been assessed by the Forests & Finance coalition, achieving an overall score of 2.8 out of 10 and ranking it as a follower. Royal Bank of Canada achieved a score of 1.9 out of 10 specifically for its policies related to the beef sector and 1.9 out of 10 for its policies related to the palm oil sector. Between 2016 and 2022, Royal Bank of Canada provided USD 71 million in credit to companies operating in these forest-risk sectors and held investments amounting to USD 63 million as of 2022. For more information, see the links below.
Forest & Finance Policy Assessment 2022: Overall scores
BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Explanation
A bank can obtain a total of 10 points for the quality of its policies. The total score is based on their scores per sector, weighted against their financing and investment for each sector. For further details on this see here. Based on their overall score, banks are then classified as Laggards, Followers, Front runners or Leaders, as follows:
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 1 points
1 - 4 points
4 - 7 points
7 - 10 points
For more details see this page.
Forest & Finance Policy Assessment 2022: Beef
BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Explanation
A bank can obtain a total of 10 points for the quality of its beef policy. The total score is based on their scores per sector, weighted against their financing and investment for each sector. For further details on this see here. Based on their overall score, banks are then classified as Laggards, Followers, Front runners or Leaders, as follows:
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 1 points
1 - 4 points
4 - 7 points
7 - 10 points
For more details see this page.
Forest & Finance Policy Assessment 2022: Palm Oil
BankLast update
Country
Score
Ranking
Details
Explanation
A bank can obtain a total of 10 points for the quality of its palm oil policy. The total score is based on their scores per sector, weighted against their financing and investment for each sector. For further details on this see here. Based on their overall score, banks are then classified as Laggards, Followers, Front runners or Leaders, as follows:
Laggard
Follower
Front runner
Leader
0 - 1 points
1 - 4 points
4 - 7 points
7 - 10 points
For more details see this page.
Tracking the NZBA
Tracking the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Royal Bank of Canada is a member of the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) and has therefore committed to reduce its financed emissions to net zero by 2050; within 18 months of joining the alliance set interim targets for 2030 (or sooner) for high emission priority sectors, and within 36 months set further sector targets; set new intermediary targets every 5 years from 2030 onwards; annually publish data on emissions and progress against a transition strategy including climate-related sectoral policies; and take a robust approach to the role of offsets in transition plans. BankTrack track's implementation of these commitments in the NZBA compliance tracker.
Banks and Steel
Banks and Steel
Partner organisation Reclaim Finance’s 2023 report on metallurgical coal financing showed that Royal Bank of Canada provided US$ 3.8 billion in loans and underwriting to developers of new metallurgical coal between 2016 and 2022. Find further details on Royal Bank of Canada’s metallurgical coal financing and and how it compares to other large banks globally in the report.
Reclaim Finance tracks the metallurgical coal policies of financial institutions, including banks, in their Coal Policy Tool. BankTrack works closely with Reclaim Finance and endorses their policy assessments. Find further details on their assessment of Royal Bank of Canada’s metallurgical coal policy below.
According to a report by Reclaim Finance, between 2016 and June 2023, Royal Bank of Canada provided $3.5 billion in finance to the fossil-steel industry, making it the 42nd largest financier worldwide. Find further details on Royal Bank of Canada's steel financing and how it compares to other large banks globally in the report.
Send feedback
on this profile